Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margarona
=[[Margarona]]=
:{{la|Margarona}} – (
:({{findsources|Margarona}})
A disputed PROD. No reliable sources indicating that this has any usage beyond a single restaurant, let alone in a widespread area; strong overtones of advertising for branded products; an unsubstantiated neologism. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep There is a reference in [http://books.google.com/books?id=XL4_ByNkz-sC&pg=PA132&lpg=PA132&dq=%2Bmargarona+tequila&source=bl&ots=zsLj42RwpP&sig=nh3bZ7YgOmMXL_k_ijEoMXleDiA&hl=en&ei=_a-OS4zgDs3O8Qaa98HwDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%2Bmargarona%20tequila&f=false a novel] and at least [http://www.flickr.com/photos/paxtonholley/3945471596/ a] [http://www.flickr.com/photos/rckmsckm/2835240427/ few] [http://www.scribd.com/doc/17662142/Mar-Vista-Dockside-Restaurant-Pub-Dinner-Menu other] [http://twitpic.com/j2zu8 places] that serve them. Not traditional sources, but they seem reliable enough for a drink. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oh my god. Read this: "It has been suggested that the mini beer was chosen to create the Margarona over of a full size beer since its compact dimensions would not affect the stability of the cocktail." If somebody can confirm the novel as a source and completely copyedit the article, it might become a weak keep, otherwise not. PanchoS (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - That picture is hilarious, but no, the article reeks of promotional tone, and it's just another made up cocktail. Shadowjams (talk) 07:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. No indication that this drink has gone mainstream. Most Google hits are for a Hotel Margarona, not for this drink. --MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
::P.S. The author and only editor of the article, one User:Kcklco, appears to be a single-purpose account. --MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.