Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margit Eklund

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 03:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[Margit Eklund]]=

:{{la|Margit Eklund}} ([{{fullurl:Margit Eklund|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margit Eklund}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable actress. One of a series of articles created by user on his non-notable production company. Fails WP:BIO, WP:COI. Redfarmer (talk) 09:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redfarmer (talk) 10:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redfarmer (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources thus is not notable. The article appears to have been cribbed entirely from IMDB, which may be a copyright problem (as well as using an unreliable source). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redfarmer (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete-Although I managed to get some hits, two of them are in a foreign language and the rest point to either Wikipedia or do not have enough notability to be of any use. Wikipedia has many strict policies on biographies and one of them points to an article's verifiability. That said, I say delete. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.