Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Alovert

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

=[[Maria Alovert]]=

:{{la|Maria Alovert}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maria_Alovert Stats])

:({{Find sources|Maria Alovert}})

Unsourced article. Two of the three references are dead links and the third is irrelevant to the article. Most references of her on other websites also lead to dead links, and there are no mentions of her for a few years now, and her [http://girlmark.com personal website] seems to have not been renewed. There are a few mentions of her scamming students out of their money, which could explain that. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 10:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:17, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment, Found a dead link, deleted a dead link, added a new link. Two decent sources, but not enough. Unless more can be found. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.