Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Steed

:{{la|Marilyn Steed}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marilyn_Steed Stats])

:({{Find sources|Marilyn Steed}})

A biography I was going to use for this article listed the subject as Steed but was actually another wife. As it stands, this article shouldn't be kept. --Kbabej (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 00:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete - I'm not sure I fully understand your afd reason listed, but I don't see the notability. She may very well be a notable member within the community, but that doesn't translate into being notable to the rest of the world. So far I can't find anything she is notable for except showing up to his court hearings. Bali88 (talk) 00:35, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• Comment - "She was always trying to shame you with her virtue and then she'd stick the knife in when your back was turned." If this is what she was notable for, we have a dilemma here. I was preparing to vote "delete" for notability but after seeing that... I think "nobility is not inherited" could be the basis for a delete argument. Yes, count me on the "delete" side please. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.