Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Bai

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Deep_Impact_(spacecraft)#Media_coverage. Black Kite (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Marina Bai]]=

:{{la|Marina Bai}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marina_Bai Stats])

:({{Find sources|Marina Bai}})

Does not pass WP:GNG, only briefly mentioned in the only reference. Ymblanter (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Deep_Impact_(spacecraft)#Media_coverage. Disagree with nominator that "she was briefly mentioned in the only reference" as a quick WP:BEFORE reveals bunches of articles (eg [http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2005-07-05-russian-sues-nasa_x.htm USa Today], [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18624982.300-feedback.html New Scientist], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4649423.stm BBC], [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/863238211.html?dids=863238211:863238211&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jul+06%2C+2005&author=Items+compiled+from+Tribune+news+services&pub=Chicago+Tribune&desc=NASA+probe+upset+cosmos%2C+suit+claims&pqatl=google Chicago Tribune]). That said, she is basically a BLP1E and Deep_Impact_(spacecraft)#Media_coverage already mentions her case, so redirecting our readers there appears the most reasonable solution. Cavarrone 06:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete and Redirect as per arguments above. Acabashi (talk) 13:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.