Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Dwight
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. SmartSE (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
=[[Mark Dwight]]=
:{{la|Mark Dwight}} – (
:({{Find sources|Mark Dwight}})
The reliable sources cited are about Rickshaw Bagworks (which might be notable) but I can't find anything where this person is the subject, so WP:BIO is not met. SmartSE (talk) 10:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
:Keep This article [http://www.sfgate.com/politics/joegarofoli/article/S-F-local-merchants-want-tech-firms-business-5305079.php 1] was published yesterday in the SF Chronicle about him. Also able to find at least one patent [http://www.google.com/patents/US8578570 2] tying him to the company mentioned above. Definitely horrendously sourced, but he appears to be notable, possibly on several fronts. And those were found with a cursory google search. C1776MTalk 19:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
::Hmm. That source definitely changes things - it didn't exist when I prodded it. I'll withdraw this nomination and trim the article of crappy sources. SmartSE (talk) 19:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.