Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Erwin
=[[Mark Erwin]]=
:{{la|Mark Erwin}} ([{{fullurl:Mark Erwin|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Erwin}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
fails WP:BIO badly. no third party coverage in Australia as indicated by [http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?q=%22mark+erwin%22+site%3A.au&hl=en&ned=au&ie=UTF-8 Google news search]. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as nn. Fails WP:BIO per nom.--Sting Buzz Me... 12:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I'm a fan of Mark's and have personally heard or witnessed him working on more than 6 radio shows for SEN, NIRS, Radio2 and other international stations. He also worked as an Internet TV presenter for the AFL for a number of years, including the 2004,5&6 AFL Grand Finals. Why don't you just contact SEN in Melbourne and AFL Films at the minimum to find out that it is not only true, but also only a short summary of his work, from Australia to Taiwan. It would be a shame to delete factual articles such as Mark's and many others. Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.117.181.221 (talk) 16:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC) — 59.117.181.221 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. {{ #if: | The preceding unsigned comment was added at {{{2}}} (UTC).}}
::It's quite simple, Mark like any person with an article on Wikipedia must satisfy WP:BIO with reliable sources proving this. I haven't been able to find anything. secondly simply being a radio presenter is not necessarily notable. Michellecrisp (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.