Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Grand

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Mark Grand]]=

:{{la|Mark Grand}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Mark Grand}})

Unreferenced biography of a living person. EDIe (claim of notability?) is unverifiable. Proposed deletion contested by creator who is also the subject of the article. Pnm (talk) 04:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete - I am unable to find significant coverage of this person. I have examined the sources in the article. Most are by him, not about him, and I am unconvinced that Java Coffee Break is a reliable source for biographical information. In any case, were Java Coffee Break a reliable source, the WP:N requirement is for multiple sources. My good faith searches were unable to uncover further significant coverage in reliable sources. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete I see no evidence of reliable, non-trivial secondary coverage of either Mr. Grand or his work. Doesn't seem to pass either the general notability guideline or the author notability guideline. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 05:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Hard to find any notability at all here, per any WP policy. Qworty (talk) 08:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

:*But that did not justify your removal of his name from the dab page at Grand, which I have reverted. PamD (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.