Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Libbery

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Unverifiable. Speedy deleted because of being possible attack page. Mgm|^(talk) 22:24, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

=[[Mark Libbery]]=

:{{la|Mark Libbery}} ([{{fullurl:Mark Libbery|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Libbery}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

As far as I can tell this is a combination of a hoax and an attack page on a non-notable person of this name (see history). I have found no online evidence that Mark Libbery (or Libbeter) exists; he is not listed by either Southampton Solent University[http://www.solent.ac.uk/Homepage.aspx] or the Fifth Estate Online.[http://www.fifth-estate-online.co.uk/editorialinfo.html] Espresso Addict (talk) 00:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 00:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete No reason to believe he exists from searches. Looks like an attack page on a nonexistent person. Usually have one or the other, not both.John Z (talk) 01:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

:*I suspect the target is a student at Southampton Solent whose name is or resembles "Libbery" or "Libbeter". Espresso Addict (talk) 01:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 01:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:RS. So tagged Undead Warrior (talk) 01:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete quickly please. This prank is wasting electrons. Drmies (talk) 03:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I tried to find out more about this person through a few searches. My conclusion is the same that others reached above; that this person does not exist. Also, I vaguely remember seeing a similar article before here going through a deletion discussion. I believe it was deleted, but I am not sure.--Eric Yurken (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.