Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market dynamics

:{{la|Market dynamics}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Market dynamics}})

Non-notable original research, spam. Only references are articles by the author of the entry. Previously deleted as Market Dynamics. Editor discusses issues with previous version on the talk page, but there is still no reason to think this is notable or anything more than self-promotion. Hairhorn (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

--------

Prior deletion was due to lack of references that were independent and peer reviewed. The submission was re-entered after such references were available (see article) from two peer reviewed journals. It seems that the notability requirements has been modified since the original submission to require a secondary source, which by current definition excludes publications by the editor which is considered the primary source.

The intent of the submission is not self-promotion as is indicated above. I believe the material is of interest and use to a wide audience.

If you believe the notability issue cannot be overcome despite of reputable peer reviewed articles, then a deletion is in order as suggested. Regards.

Jdayanim (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

---

• Delete:

:*...a method for modeling and forecasting the price movements of traded securities and their composites.

:*The method further develops parallelisms with Classical Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, such as an equivalency between price and potential energy density. These linkages enable access to an existing pool of knowledge with its potential application to the fields of finance and investment management.

:*The dynamics of price resembles concepts from the classical science of motion. To demonstrate this point, consider the concept of energy. Classically, Work (W) performed on an object by an external force is measured as the product of force and displacement, or for a fluid counterpart as the product of change in pressure and volume.

:*Patent Pending on methods detailed in this article

• This page is promoting one man's theory, apparently the original author's ("Joshua F. Dayanim"). - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.