Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marly Halpern-Graser

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. While much of Halpern-Graser's work is notable, it does not appear that he himself is (yet). In particular it does not appear that there are any reliable sources which are devoted to talking about Halpern-Graser himself, rather than about his work. Kaldari (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

=[[Marly Halpern-Graser]]=

:{{la|Marly Halpern-Graser}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marly_Halpern-Graser Stats])

:({{Find sources|Marly Halpern-Graser}})

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Article references are list mentions only. Fails WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 22:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

I disagree. Emmy nomination and several notable credits in the comic book industry. His credits and bio seems to fall within the WP:BIO guidelines. haverford29

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete - Press coverage is trivial mentions only. --Cerebellum (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep per minor notability discernible through Emmy Awards nomination and verifiability of his body of work. A young fellow whose was sharing his opinions even when far younger. In 2003, his brief opinion about Bush's approval rating was picked up Associated Press and shared in [http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-09-08-bush-speech-react_x.htm USA Today], [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=MDBZAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ekcNAAAAIBAJ&pg=6025,919153&dq=marly-halpern-graser&hl=en The Union Democrat] and even [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GexQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=DL4MAAAAIBAJ&pg=5525,1646002&dq=marly-halpern-graser&hl=en The Telegraph Herald] A 1672-word 2007 [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/1219890461.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+18%2C+2007&author=J.M.+Berger&pub=Boston+Globe&desc=Sound+the+alarm%3B+What+people+think+of+us+these+days+is+at+the+mercy+of+what's+on+the+Web&pqatl=googleBoston Globe] article speaks about Halpern-Graser and his involvement with the Zebro troupe. An October 2008 article in [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/1581783091.html?dids=1581783091:1581783091&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+24%2C+2008&author=JOEL+STEIN&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Voters%2C+not+slackers&pqatl=google2008 Los Angeles Times] and picked up by [http://thecabin.net/stories/102508/opi_1025080018.shtml TheCabin] gives us conformation of his being a stand-up comedian and that he has political views about voter registration. SIGCOV would be fine, but he is not "known" for being being written about... his is notable for his works as verifiable in reliable sources to meet WP:CREATIVE... and their does seem to be enough other more-than-trivial coverage to maintain and further build this article. We certainly do not really expect that a brand new article from a [http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php?name=Haverford29&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia 43-lifetime-edits-ever] inexperienced contributor would be perfect from day one.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marly_Halpern-Graser&action=history] This article can stay and grow over time and through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Weak delete. He wasn't directly nominated for that Emmy. Doczilla _STOMP! 22:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Weak delete due to lack of coverage and lack of obvious individual notability. The Primetime Emmy nomination was for the show, not for him directly - as one of several writers it obviously relates to him, but it's a bit weak for supporting a standalone article. --Michig (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.