Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marquis Maze
=[[Marquis Maze]]=
:{{la|Marquis Maze}} – (
:({{Find sources|Marquis Maze}})
Reason Opguip (talk) 14:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Does not make the notability guidelines for college athletes
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Maze had over 1,000 receiving yards in his sophomore and junior years. He was a member of Alabama's 2009 national championship team. As a senior in 2011, he is on the watch list for the Biletnikoff Award, and he's the lead receiver, punt returner and kickoff returner for the 2011 Alabama team, the No. 2 college football team in the USA. He had over 250 all-purpose yards in the season opener last Saturday. More importantly, he has been the subject of significant, non-trivial coverage in the mainstream media. As one of the most prominent players on the No. 2 team in the country, the coverage is going to continue week by week as his accomplishments mount, but he's already had enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable college athlete (as of now). Being a member of a notable team does not make a person notable. — X96lee15 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Cbl62. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep{{spaced ndash}}Easily passes Wikipedia:GNG, See: Yahoo search [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Marquis+Maze&fr=ush-globalnews here] and open some of the links. The player is notable. Northamerica1000 (talk) 03:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
:*Comment{{spaced ndash}}More verifiability, Yahoo News:[http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Marquis+Maze&ei=UTF-8&fr=ush-globalnews&fr2=newsdd here]. Northamerica1000 (talk) 03:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.