Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsel Efroimski

{{Delrevafd|date=2010 July 1}}

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 02:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

=[[Marsel Efroimski]]=

:{{la|Marsel Efroimski}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsel Efroimski}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Marsel Efroimski}})

not sure if WP:ATHLETE applies to chess players but simply being an under 14 world champion should not mean notability. does not extensive coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Marsel+Efroimski&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 07:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Appears in enough [http://jta.org/news/article/2007/11/29/105601/israelichess sources] to convince me of notability. (Also see [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-158635697.html this] and other [http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/sports/sports-shorts-1.3540 sources].) Undead Warrior (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete her ratings do not suggest that she is one of the best chess players in the world. -Drdisque (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete No significant coverage of this individual from reliable independent sources. Lustralaustral (talk) 00:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.