Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Boďa

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Martin Boďa}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Boďa}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Martin Boďa}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. plicit 13:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Martin Boďa]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Martin Boďa}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Martin Boďa}})

Despite playing for a professional level, I can't find enough significant coverage of this Slovak men's footballer to meet WP:GNG. In terms of reliable secondary sources, [https://myturiec.sme.sk/c/23330520/nedavno-vstaval-na-siestu-do-roboty-na-jesen-si-moze-zahrat-europsku-ligu.html SME] looks decent but GNG requires multiple in-depth coverage, while [https://zilina.sp21.sk/a/3439/utocnik-mfk-ruzomberok-martin-boda-bude-mi-trvat-sest-mesiacov-kym-sa-znovu-vratim-do-treningoveho-procesu SP21] heavily relies on quotes without independent analysis. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.