Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Daly

:{{la|Martin Daly}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Martin_Daly Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Martin Daly}})

Lacks Notability Biography of Living Person Star Log, Lfrankblam, Kirk Out (talk) 00:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Keep Membership in the Royal Society of Canada seems to be enough to meet WP:PROF criterion 3. Jinkinson talk to me 00:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. Authored several papers with hundreds of citations each. Extremely clear notability per WP:SCHOLAR. --Sammy1339 (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy keep Nom is reminded of WP:BEFORE. A quick look at WP:PROF shows that Daly meets this without any problem. EIC of a respected journal, president of a major society, etc. --Randykitty (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
• Keep At this point it's a SNOW KEEP. He obviously passes WP:PROF for multiple reasons - membership in a society, number of citations, etc. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
• Snow keep. Please google before starting an AFD.ShulMaven (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.