Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Eisend

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Martin Eisend]]=

:{{la|1=Martin Eisend}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Martin Eisend}})

Many publications and extensive promotional content, but likely not notable Wikipedia:Notability (academics) Cinder painter (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Keep.: with 13,000 citations and an h-index of 59, subject meets C1 of WP:NPROF. Qflib (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Keep with caveats. It needs a lot of work to cut out the ~~pain~~ paid contributions, but AfD isn't the place for that. Just an aside: if he paid for it, he was ripped off. Clearly passes the Prof Test as noted above; also full chair at a good university. Bearian (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.