Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin John Callanan (3rd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 18:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Martin John Callanan]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin John Callanan}}

:{{la|Martin John Callanan}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Martin_John_Callanan_(3rd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Martin John Callanan}})

Bio lacking notability. No indication awards are major (and at least one is only one of many finalists). Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Mostly show announcements or passing mentions. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

:: Keep, clearly notable Sandisk16 (talk) 08:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC) — Sandisk16 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Weak keep - additions to the article make him seem just about notable enough. PamD 21:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep - i don't know how notable he is, but he's certainly done enough for an article. --Jethro B 18:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.