Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Michlmayr

:{{la|Martin Michlmayr}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Michlmayr}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Martin Michlmayr}})

• Delete: This individual does not meet the general notability guideline. It is not important to have an article for every manager of the Debian project. Marokwitz (talk) 08:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep - Meets notability guidelines through significant coverage in reliable independent sources. [http://www.linux.org/news/2005/01/05/0001.html Newsforge article here] (sadly behind a paywall), [http://www.pro-linux.de/NB3/artikel/2/602 Pro Linux interview here] (in German), plus plenty of coverage of him entering and leaving the role. - DustFormsWords (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep - Would break an otherwise complete set of :Category:Debian Project leaders... as note above, these easily pass WP:RS and WP:NOTABLE because of news coverage (even if, I agree, the article is lacking in including those sources currently). —Sladen (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silverseren^C 18:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

• Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silverseren^C 18:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep I have added more sources, this article is clearly notable. Silverseren^C 18:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.