Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martita

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 19:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Martita]]=

:{{la|Martita}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Martita Stats])

:({{Find sources|Martita}})

I don't watch Spanish-language TV, but I'm not finding any references, and the only one this article has is a dead link. Hard to believe a coffee server merits an article to herself. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete. I did find another English language reference to a 2002 South Florida Sun newspaper article [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sun_sentinel/access/112931793.html?dids=112931793:112931793&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+03%2C+2002&author=Monika+Leal+Special+Correspondent&pub=South+Florida+Sun+-+Sentinel&desc=UNIVISION'S+FEARLESS+COFFEE+LADY+GETS+USED+TO+THE+GRIND+OF+STARDOM&pqatl=google abstract here], but the article itself is behind a paywall. However, I remain unconvinced of notability sufficient to justify an encyclopedia article. Martita is not mentioned, for example, in the El Gordo y la Flaca article. At best, a mention in that article would seem to be more appropriate than a separate article. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 00:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete.Per above This individual definitely does not merit her own article. Finnegas (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.