Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Comic's Civil War reading list

{{ns:0|F}}

:{{la|Marvel Comic's Civil War reading list}} ([{{fullurl:Marvel Comic's Civil War reading list|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Comic's Civil War reading list}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unencyclopedic, original research Tomdobb (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• The Civil War (comics) article is in need of a chronology such as this, but to simply merge into a new section would overpower the original article. I therefore recommend that we place this information in a collapsible template and place it in Civil War (comics). AfD hero (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
• :Done. AfD hero (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Delete This is a very good example of original research. The first sentence practically screams it. Tavix (talk) 16:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Emperor (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - I raised concerns over this article when it started - my suggestion was that we should split off the "tie-ins" and trade paperback sections of Civil War (comics) and merge them in her making something like a "Civil War publications" article (Civil War is already large and the obvious split would be in that area). I am not sure if this is a workable approach (perhaps slimming down Civil War would be a better way of doing it) but the article isn't viable as it stands (I mention that it is the kind of thing better suited to the publisher's site or a fan site) but there is potential to rework it. If not then transwiki it to the Marvel Comics Database Project on Wikia and redirect this to Civil War (comics). (Emperor (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC))
• Do as Emperor says, and/or merge into Civil War (comics) and redirect. Page could be reworked, but is no good as-is. BOZ (talk) 16:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to Civil War (comics) - this list is a tad bit arbitrary, and is not a notable subject for a list --T-rex 16:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete, comics trivia, POV. JIP | Talk 18:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite Jmbranum (talk) 00:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
• Merge per AfD hero if the reading order can be sited (although it would obviously be primary source). Otherwise it is OR and probably doesn't belong. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per the very wise Boz and Emperor. There isn't even any real, encyclopedically viable information here to merge. Ford MF (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - appears to be OR. Ifany of the links are good they might be salvagable for the main article. Artw (talk) 07:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per the very wise Boz and Emperor as well. Hiding T 17:31, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Somebody's homecooked reading list for comic books. I understand the concept of it, but it's OR and is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.