Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Dixon (artist)

:{{la|Mason Dixon (artist)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mason_Dixon_(artist) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mason Dixon (artist)}})

This article just makes no sense, is almost entirely lacking in secondary sources and the subject has had a big hand as author of the page. I can't see anything relaible online that even begins to hint about who this person is or what they do. Whatever it is, it certainly isn't notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. PROD declined by author in 2009. Sionk (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete Does not meet WP:ACADEMIC Kabirat (talk) 08:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete (not notable) TEDickey (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

---

• Delete. Above assessments seem to be spot-on. Agricola44 (talk) 19:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.