Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matabele Campaign

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Since there's no substantial edits to the article aside from Tristan benedict's, I'm going to enterpret his comment as a db-author request. Further note to Tristan benedict, if you later decide to recreate the same article, it's likely to be nominated for deletion again Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

=[[Matabele Campaign]]=

:{{la|Matabele Campaign}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Matabele Campaign}})

Unnecessary, unreferenced and frankly inaccurate article (it wasn't the British Army for a start). Serves only an umbrella for two extant articles which are already well entrenched in Wikipedia, and easily accessible. I say delete. —Cliftonian (talk) 03:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

:*Delete as nominator. —Cliftonian (talk) 03:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

::*Note that I've cleaned this up a little, but I still support deletion. —Cliftonian (talk) 03:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.