Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maternity

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Maternal bond. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 14:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Maternity]]=

:{{la|Maternity}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Maternity}})

Dicdef, has not seen any growth since creation in 2004. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I think we should turn this into a disambiguation page for Maternity leave and Maternal bond. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Redirect to mother or maternal bond or something. The content needs to be scrapped, as it is garbage ("legal acknowledgment"?). Mark, read WP:PTM. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out, I hadn't seen that guideline before. But I think this falls under the so-called "Mississippi compromise". Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Redirect to maternal bond. Of the two options for redirects, this seems to convey the message of maternity the best. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.