Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matheus Eccard

=[[Matheus Eccard]]=

:{{la|Matheus Eccard}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Matheus_Eccard Stats])

:({{Find sources|Matheus Eccard}})

Though this article techinically meets WP:NFOOTBALL, this is only because of two appearances about two years ago in the Romanian Liga I and the Romanian Cup. He has done nothing since, and pretty clearly fails general notability. Google search produces only the usual player profiles. In my opinion, this article pretty clearly falls under the part of WP:NSPORT. the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. (emphasis theirs).

Furthermore, the article maybe eligible for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G5. The article was created by a sockpuppet in violation of a block. The only edit in the two years since, that wasn't just formatting, was one that updated the lede and infobox to show that he had left Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ, and removed the squad template. This does not constitute substantial editing in my opinion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - Players career seems to have reached a professional hiatus. Nothing to suggest GNG. No problems recreating if he moves to another club in an FPL and starts playing regularly. At the moment he has played a grand total of 9 mins of FPL football per Soccerway and that some time ago. Fenix down (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.