Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathias Fischedick

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Mathias Fischedick]]=

:{{la|Mathias Fischedick}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mathias_Fischedick Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mathias Fischedick}})

Subject fails WP:BIO. Google [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22Mathias+Fischedick%22&oq=%22Mathias+Fischedick%22&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.1790.2810.0.3058.3.2.0.1.0.0.154.237.1j1.2.0...0.0...1ac.1.L2QUF7EPAQs shows nothing]. Nothing more than vanity spam Hu12 (talk) 03:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Delete Aside from a couple of passing mentions (most substantially [http://www.ksta.de/gesundheit/gesundheits-serie--teil-8-die-kunst--den-eigenen-typ-zu-finden,15938564,12061800.html this (German)], which quotes but is not really about the subject) I am not finding anything that can support :WP:ANYBIO notability. Note also previous deletion from the German Wikipedia: [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Fischedick] AllyD (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 06:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete per nom. No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Wikipedical (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.