Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matilda Buffalo Turf

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. extransit (talk) 09:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

=[[Matilda Buffalo Turf]]=

:{{la|Matilda Buffalo Turf}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Matilda Buffalo Turf}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Matilda Buffalo Turf}})

Non-notable per WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY, unreferenced, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, borderline WP:SPAM. Prod contested by creator. Top Jim (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Top Jim (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Top Jim (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This is almost blatant advertising, and it fails notability requirements. --Slon02 (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Could find no other references, other than one forum post and wiki mirrors. Note that this was also CSDed under Matilda Buffalo Turf Grass; the only sources given there were vendors selling the grass apparently. Kuru (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

:It has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matilda_Buffalo_Turf&action=historysubmit&diff=394057149&oldid=393376604 extensively cleaned up from the original submission], which was similarly larded with external links to vendors selling the grass. Top Jim (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Delete - Article is an advert, and I can find no coverage to indicate that this is a notable form of turf. -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete The article is completely unverifiable. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.