Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Glass

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Matthew Glass]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Matthew Glass}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Matthew Glass}})

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, United Kingdom, and Australia. UtherSRG (talk) 13:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I have found, and have added, several book reviews, all RSs, so there could be an argument now to keep per WP:HEY. From searches in Google, Newsbank and WikiLibrary databases I couldn't find enough RSs to meet WP:AUTHOR (I don't consider the reviews I've added sufficient to meet the AUTHOR criteria) but I think there may be sufficient to meet WP:GNG.Cabrils (talk) 00:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

  • Keep per Cabrils; these are mostly book reviews but in particular the ref from The Economist is good in my opinion. - Indefensible (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:NAUTHOR. First three references for reviews. Kudos to {{ping|Cabrils}} for updating the article per WP:HEYMANN standard. scope_creepTalk 08:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.