Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Sergeant
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
=[[Matthew Sergeant]]=
:{{la|Matthew Sergeant}} – (
:({{Find sources|Matthew Sergeant}})
Composer appears to be of zero cultural significance and this article has been orphaned for over 2 years now. Appears to have been created as part of an ego-trip. Links appear to lead to nowhere and the top link looks like a pornographic website in Japanese. Deafdumbandblindkid (talk) 08:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable. Would even go as far as to say it's a candidate for speedy deletion. EvergreenFir (talk) 09:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a candidate for speedy deletion, because the article makes a few claims of notability, but I don't see the coverage to meet WP:GNG. The prize he's won isn't very famous, the positions he's held don't establish notability, and simply being broadcast even on national radio doesn't guarantee notability. He's still a postgrad student, so he may well have a glittering career ahead of him, but searching Google/books/news only gives passing references. I'd like to see in-depth reviews of his work, detailed profiles in reliable sources, and/or serious musicological study of his work. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment -- He seems to have a small body of work, but it is very likley that each has had just one performance. I think the answer is NOTYET notable, but may be soon. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.