Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayangaathey

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Mayangaathey]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Mayangaathey}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mayangaathey}})

Couldn't find any sources for this minor film. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; doesn't appear to have any published reviews at all Spiderone 09:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep: Latest COMPLETE OVERHAUL Please read the latest version, I reformat the article into mainstream form and format styles // From no references to WITH references // I added 2 MalayMail, 2 Selliyal (Tamil), 1 Selliyal film review, all sources are very notable news websites that brings reliable information. // Remove other excessive external links --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM)
  • Comment - still insufficient, in my opinion. There is one full length review but the other sources only cover the subject extremely briefly Spiderone 15:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

:NEW LATEST Added 1 Youtube independent review source. To {{User|TamilMirchi}}, you have to know that this film, the film collected more box office, it is one of the Top 10 highest grossing Malaysian Tamil film, so it sure counts as more notability''', it is very notable --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM)

::YouTube is not a reliable source Spiderone 17:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep as there is now one full review referenced in the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete- As per NFILM guidelines, two reviews from RS are required to establish notability. Rest of the refs are basic coverage such as release date and cast names and the YouTube review is by a fan. Sunshine1191 (talk) 05:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete I can't see how the scanty coverage provided passes NFILM or GNG. (t · c) buidhe 20:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.