Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor Cupcake
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Alex Pires#Mayor Cupcake. (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Mayor Cupcake]]=
:{{la|Mayor Cupcake}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Mayor Cupcake}})
Film does not appear to satisfy WP:NFP. I found 2 local newspaper articles on the film, one from the area that it was shot in, the other reflecting most of what the original article stated. The majority of mentions are retailers selling the movie. Perhaps should just be a mention on Lea Thompson's page, if it isn't already. LovelyLillith (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: DVD Talk, which seems to be treated as a reliable source, reviewed the film [http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/49378/mayor-cupcake/ here]. CHUD.com also reviewed it [http://www.chud.com/73009/dvd-review-major-cupcake/ here] but I am less sure if that is reliable. There are a few other reviews listed [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1496798/externalreviews?ref_=tt_ql_op_5 here] but none that I recognize as reliable. Then again, I do not work with direct-to-video films often. {{ul|NinjaRobotPirate}}, you may know more than me. Have any insights? Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Alex Pires#Mayor Cupcake. A standalone article isn't merited, and it's covered in the article on the film's writer/producer/director (and can be expanded there should coverage be found). Rotten Tomatoes lists no professional reviews, and [http://www.capegazette.com/node/21267 this] was the best coverage I found. --Michig (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, a few sites that used to review low-budget independent films have closed, making it harder to establish notability for direct-to-video films. I'd consider DVD Talk a reliable source, but CHUD.com is pushing it. I did find a few sources, though. There's [http://www.pottsmerc.com/article/MP/20110724/LIFE01/307249970 this short review] from The Mercury. There's also a bit of production info from [http://blogs.delawareonline.com/pulpculture/2010/11/29/from-dewey-to-hollywood-2/ this article] at The News Journal and [http://www.delawaretoday.com/Delaware-Today/November-2009/Folk-Hero/?cparticle=5&siarticle=4 this article] from Delaware Today. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.