Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Work Inc (design company)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. – bradv 22:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Media Work Inc (design company)]]=

:{{la|1=Media Work Inc (design company)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Media Work Inc (design company)}})

Guess we have to go through this yet again. Utterly non notable company, complete promotional garbage sourced to unreliable sources, PR and other nonsense. There is absolutely nothing in the way of meaningful, in depth coverage in this article or elsewhere. Impressive client list is about the extent to which anyone can say anything about this company, though that can't even be reliably sourced. PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, England, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Advertising. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

:* Delete per WP:G11.

:Infomemoh (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Delete and salt obvious promotion, nothing to keep. May reach notability in the future, but I think it would have to come from AfC. This feels very COI. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.