Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediamerx

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Mediamerx]]=

:{{la|Mediamerx}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mediamerx Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mediamerx}})

Promotional article created by a WP:SPA about a company that provides trivial products/services, completely fails WP:NCORP. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Keep. The company may have closed down, but once notable, always notable. Disregarding the press releases, the references from TV Week and GigaOm (formerly newteevee.com) appear to be reasonably comprehensive and from reliable sources, enough to establish notability. [https://www.multichannel.com/news/stone-age-video-136169 This link] is brief, but helps to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Delete: For me, the TVWeek "Digital Dealmakers" profile of the company CEO and the GigaOM item are start-up proposition coverage; for example the latter concludes "Will it work? We shall see. For now the company has four people and a small amount of funding, but to meet its ambitions it will need more than technological innovation.": does that either claim or establish attained notability? After a couple of years the company appears to have [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kaptur/startup-aims-to-kaptur-bigger-slice-of-lucrative-wedding-market-idUSTRE7A373620111104 morphed into Kaptur], seeking position in the wedding photo market, and then to [https://www.ahalife.com/press/2013/07/24/pandodaily/why-would-ahalife-a-luxury-commerce-site-buy-kaptur-a-photo-sharing-app have been acquired] by :Ahalife, and to have been regarded as a start-up throughout. (The other venture described in the text, Sportpass.tv, still exists, though its "About" page consists of "Lorem ipsum" content, so it is unclear who operates it.) I don't see anything sufficient for the current :WP:CORPDEPTH standards. AllyD (talk) 12:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete A Search turns up nothing on GNEWS and doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH Edidiong (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete. never was notable. DGG ( talk ) 07:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.