Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical Design Excellence Awards

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Medical Design Excellence Awards]]=

:{{la|Medical Design Excellence Awards}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Medical_Design_Excellence_Awards Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Medical Design Excellence Awards}})

Fails to meet notability guidelines. All 31 references are press releases, or citations from captive publications of the media company that created the awards. Few or no independent news sources or publications cite or mention the awards. Mcenedella (talk)(contribs) 09:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

  • delete could maybe survive as a list article but there would need to be enough reliable, independent sources showing the topic is notable and I have not found them. Jytdog (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete -- PR driven award from a marginally notable entity, the UBM Canon media group. K.e.coffman (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 14:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.