Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical Guardian

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Medical Guardian]]=

:{{la|Medical Guardian}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Medical_Guardian Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Medical Guardian}})

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Keep not sure what the rationale for deletion is. The article has 3 independent secondary sources. The content of these articles is not trivial or commercial. Therefore it meets the notability criteria. Needs a little rewording because of some promotional lingo. --^Melody _Lavender 12:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete Sources are all either primary, a database entry (inc), or about Gross not Medical Guardian. Could probably be speedied as unambiguous advertising. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete - Inc.com confirms the company exists, Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Business Journal are interviews with the company founder by regional news companies and Shipley is an article about the founder on a bloody school website. One cannot reasonably claim that this consists of significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources! The use of weasel words and lack of objectivity give credence to the nominator's assertion that this is WP:ARTSPAM. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 11:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.