Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medicine Show Cinema

:{{la|Medicine Show Cinema}} ([{{fullurl:Medicine Show Cinema|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medicine Show Cinema}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No notability asserted. Wikipedia does not exist for self-promotion. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 10:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:SPAM. Baileypalblue (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Before giving an opinion, I felt compelled to go to the article and clean the sucker up... setting it up per MOS and setting up the references so they were refs and not simply inline EL's. My conclusion is that 1) yes... the article is quite spammy and 2) their is a major WP:COI for the author as he is writing about his own company. That worry aside... their projects all seem to fall under WP:Crystal as there is litle online about them that does circle right back to the fimmaker's own website. I tried to find independent WP:N for the [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Medicine+Show+Cinema%22&aq=f&oq= company itself] with the same results... nothing independent. Yes, the blogs are active about it... and in a few months there may actually be WP:RS about the company and its films... but currently? No. I urge the closing admin to userfy this back to its author... despite his obvious COI. He may find sponsorship from another wikipedian when the time is ripe. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as per User:MichaelQSchmidt. Power.corrupts (talk) 23:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.