Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medohar Vidangadi Lauh

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Medohar Vidangadi Lauh]]=

:{{la|Medohar Vidangadi Lauh}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Medohar_Vidangadi_Lauh Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Medohar Vidangadi Lauh}})

I'm not seeing sources for this. It has a trivial mention in the first reference, and the second reference is a blog. I'm not convinced this has any real notability that one could form an article around, which may explain why the article doesn't even rise to the standard of definition. I've googled it in an attempt to check for sources, and, well, there's about 5000 hits, most of which seem to be very small-scale sellers. I'm not convinced this even rises to WP:GNG, though there is a chance that it might be better known under another name. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.3% of all FPs} 20:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Delete fails GNG. -Roxy the effin dog . wooF 11:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete I can only find four books with mentions, three of which are only Ayurveda directories (but Wikipedia is not a directory per WP:NOTDIRECTORY) and one with a small description, that's already used in the article. No indication of any medically reliable source that could serve to better cover it. —Paleo Neonate – 18:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.