Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meet Me in St. Louis (band)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 12:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Meet Me in St. Louis (band)]]=

:{{la|Meet Me in St. Louis (band)}} ([{{fullurl:Meet Me in St. Louis (band)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meet Me in St. Louis (band)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I'm not sure in the end if one release on an independent label is enough to pass WP:MUSIC. I guess it could depend on how much to value the album's publicity stunt of creating an unofficial public holiday. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1 for all the reviews on the Variations on Swing article. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 06:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Album is widely available (both on Amazon UK and LastFM) which is a useful screening tool for notability and press coverage. Searching is complicated by the commonality of the name, but searching with other info shows some hits of recognition. Shadowjams (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep meets WP:MUSIC per Esradekan. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.