Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meg Thomann

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 21:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

=[[Meg Thomann]]=

:{{la|Meg Thomann}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Meg_Thomann Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Meg Thomann}})

Not enough third party WP:RS sources to meet WP:BASIC.

[https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=l8nUV4P0IKr98wfCkoLoCw&gws_rd=ssl,cr&fg=1#tbm=nws&q=%22Meg+Thomann%22 A writer, editor not in any news]. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

delete I took a swing at sourcing this; failed to find more than is already in article. young-ish editor once-major magazine, that now puts out a handful of special issues a year. It may simply be WP:TOOSOON].E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Keep: LHJ is an iconic publication, if recently much-reduced. But add to that her work for The Advocate, and I think we have adequate indicia to meet GNG. Montanabw^(talk) 21:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete This is WP:TOOSOON. Third party sources are specifically required per WP:WHYN and I am unable to find any at the moment. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:38, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete, originally I was on the fence, but when you actually look at the sources they're usually about other things and only briefly mention Thomann. This doesn't mean that she's not very good at what she does or isn't having a successful career, but she doesn't meet the guidelines set out in WP:BIO. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.