Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megi Luka
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Megi Luka}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megi Luka}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Megi Luka}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Megi Luka]]=
:{{la|Megi Luka}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Megi Luka}})
Whilst the winner of a national beauty pageant (non-notable competition - see WP:1EVENT), did not place in the international pageant. Has no other significant achievements. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing is a blog and a press release. This is not multiple reliable secondary sources that are indepdent of the subject as is required to show someone is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.