Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehak Malik
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Mehak Malik]]=
:{{la|1=Mehak Malik}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mehak Malik}})
Does not satisfy WP:NBIO nor WP:NMODEL. Entirely unsourced.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.
[[User:CanonNi ]] | contribs) 07:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The BLP [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mehak_Malik&oldid=940910020 previously] included references, but they seem to have been deleted. However, I agree that the subject may not meet the WP:GNG. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 08:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unable to find any good sources for this individual. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 10:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The [e]{{tq|ntirely unsourced}} claim in the OP seems to have been made based on a version of the article that existed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mehak_Malik&diff=1221039227&oldid=1219781659 after it had been blanked by an IP]. There do seem to be sources, and I am presuming good faith about the coverage in sources written in a language I am not able to read (as notability can be provided via non-English sources). I have also found coverage of Malik in [http://111.68.103.26//journals/index.php/jms/article/view/4027 the Journal of Media Studies] and [https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2023.0502.0146 the Journal of Economics]. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 21:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.