Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meme Molly

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

=[[Meme Molly]]=

:{{la|Meme Molly}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Meme Molly}})

This is a borderline case. I agree that Meme Molly certainly merits a mention and section in the main Rocketboom article - however, I don't believe her notability independent of her activities with Rocketboom merits a standalone article. A previous redirect to Rocketboom was reverted after two weeks with a rather weak rationale, and considering the article talk page has been dead since December, I don't think a discussion there would prove very fruitful. As I said elsewhere, this article reads like a Teen People bio, and I think that's indicative of the fact that beyond her position as a host of a popular vlog, there simply isn't much notability going on here. Badger Drink (talk) 06:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep I don't see a problem with WP:N here? I see that you don't mention a conflict with WP:N either, just that in your opinion it's better to delete it... --DeVerm (talk) 23:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC).
  • Keep Also don't see WP:N issues here. Her YouTube channel was ranked among the top 10 in the UK and now she hosts one of the oldest web shows still running. --Jamiew (talk) 02:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.