Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memwatch

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Memwatch}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Memwatch}})

Fails WP:GNG. Run of the mill programming tool, not to mention, its notability problems have not improved since receiving a notability tag in March 2014. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: [https://www.computerworld.com/article/1632315/review-5-memory-debuggers-for-linux-coding-2.html] [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Building_Embedded_Linux_Systems/I-hVqkX6A9cC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=memwatch&pg=PA347&printsec=frontcover] and [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Red_Hat_Linux/sndud-3rob0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=memwatch&pg=PA467&printsec=frontcover], along with the sources on the article talk page, should demonstrate notability, although narrowly. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: per the sources above, along with [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Advanced_Research_on_Electronic_Commerce/JbyQcjOWigAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=memwatch&pg=PA313&printsec=frontcover]. The usage of the tool is explained quite well in the sources. Conyo14 (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

:

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.