Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messerschmitt Me 334

:{{la|Messerschmitt Me 334}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Messerschmitt_Me_334 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Messerschmitt Me 334}})

No basis in fact other than the designation, everything else is complete nonsense Petebutt (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

• keep and possibly pull more info/links from [https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lippisch_Projekt_Me_334 German WP]. Artw (talk) 01:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

• Keep per Artw, aircraft types generally considered to be notable enough to sustain an article, subject to the usual guidelines. Mjroots (talk) 21:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
• Keep - German Wikipedia has an authoritative paper ref, meets WP:N with that. - Ahunt (talk) 23:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

::I have removed the nonsense and blatant copyvio. RE-written the complete article so the AfD can be closed.--Petebutt (talk) 14:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

::: Awesome work. I would be in favour of an early close on the basis of this. Artw (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.