Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetroTwit

=[[MetroTwit]]=

:{{la|MetroTwit}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MetroTwit Stats])

:({{Find sources|MetroTwit}})

Article cites no sources. References on [https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=MetroTwit&oq=MetroTwit&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=news-cc.12...780.780.0.1353.1.1.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0. Google News] appear to show use of the service but do not discuss it. Problem tags have been there for a while and not much resolution towards fixing them. LauraHale (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Google news has more than just use of the service: there are several brief mentions and also an [http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-20016832-56.html interview with the programmer] but I agree that's not enough to meet WP:GNG. (I'll cite the interview in the article in a minute.) A general Google search throws up lots of positive reviews for the software but I didn't see anything looking like a reliable source. I wouldn't be surprised if the software became notable in the future but, since the article contains so little information and deletion doesn't prejudice future recreation, I don't think any harm would be done by deleting the current version. Dricherby (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete per Dricherby, fails WP:GNG  —HueSatLum 17:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.