Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mewthree

:{{la|Mewthree}} ([{{fullurl:Mewthree|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mewthree}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Doesn't establish notability. -sesuPRIME ^{talk • contribs} 03:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

:Delete as above -- Patchy1^(talk) 03:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

:Since when are fan-made creations in crappy hacks notable? I'd agree with delete, but don't want to see this page created again in the future. How about a redirect to WP:PCP? MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

:Delete There is no third party coverage, completely fan made and completely unnotable.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:55, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

::I don't think a redirect is needed. It's on my watchlist, so if it is recreated after it's inevitable deletion, I'll catch it and nominate it again. -sesuPRIME ^{talk • contribs} 05:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

• Delete as everyone knows, it's fake. So why bother writing about it? Nate • (chatter) 07:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, unofficial Pokémon, exists only in fan-based hack, therefore not notable. JIP | Talk 09:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
• delete and redirect to Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen, the game that the rom was hacked from. -- ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 12:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete and don't redirect, hacks aren't notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - Fan hacks are Wp:NN, and it (literally) fails Wp:NFT. (It's also incorrect - This has been around since at least 2001: I recall seeing information about it (which also called it fake) in a guide to Pokémon Gold and Silver.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. No assertion of notability. No need for a redirect, either, considering none of the other Pokémon articles cover this subject. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 15:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, article infact admits itself that Mewthree as a Pokemon is a hoax. No need for a redirect. --Taelus (talk) 15:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, who in their right mind would contest a PROD to 'this' of all things? ^blurred_peace ☮ 17:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Actually, it was never prodded. It should have been. Oh, Delete BTW. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect to Mewtwo and protect.--Otterathome (talk) 10:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.