Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Baudot

:{{la|Mia Baudot}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mia_Baudot Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mia Baudot}})

Doesn't meet a single one of the WP:ARTIST criteria. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

:Delete The article exists on the Dutch wiki, but has no sources there either. Both were written by the same person within a day of one another. Additionally one of the editors to the Mia Baudot page on the english wiki is none other than miabaudot. Snood1205 (talk) 23:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 07:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. Per G S Palmer's analysis of the notability criteria. CaptRik (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I have removed the example artwork from the article per the image use policy (watermarked). SpinningSpark 09:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - neither evidence nor assertion of notability. I think I smell snow coming. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - per A7 and OM. ukexpat (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.