Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Andrec

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Michael Andrec]]=

:{{la|Michael Andrec}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Andrec Stats])

:({{Find sources|Michael Andrec}})

fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSICBIO. this is essentially a stub, and the sources are not third party. LibStar (talk) 06:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete I have added one review of an album by one of the ensembles in which the subject has been involved (and it does sound interesting as a project), but unfortunately not enough for :WP:MUSICBIO. AllyD (talk) 07:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep. Cyrillic searches yield more.--Lute88 (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

: please show these sources in Cyrillic that meet WP:RS. LibStar (talk) 06:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - Trivial mentions at Highbeam: Smindak, Helen. "Dateline New York: A cultural selection for everyone." The Ukrainian Weekly. The Ukrainian Weekly. 2000. Retrieved June 07, 2013 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79656370.html Nothing rising to GNG or N as a result. Singular mentions of the band, and playing music and that's all. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Non notable, should be deleted. Koala15 (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.