Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bedford
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Having no sources clinched it. WP:BLP, remember? Sandstein 20:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
=[[:Michael Bedford]]=
:{{la|Michael Bedford}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Michael Bedford}})
I couldn't find reliable sources that proves the subject's notability. TheGGoose (talk) 20:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there's barely any actual significance as it is, let alone for substantiating both independent notability and substance and there's nothing else suggesting otherwise. As a note, this was literally PRODed when started yet the author boldly removed it, not only without apparently acknowledging the concerns (and that was 2009!) but not adding any actual substance whatsoever, instead simply making a few changes here and there. SwisterTwister talk 00:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 10:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep The original author/editor didn't source or add it (and as noted above seemingly ignored requests for supporting refs when the article was tagged as PROD). However, there is seemingly some evidence that the subject meets WP:MUSIC - by virtue of having "a single [..] on any country's national music chart". (Subject seems to have charted at least one single, and possibly two singles, in Italian, Spanish and/or Swiss national charts. During the mid-80s). Keep if a reliable chart source is offered. Guliolopez (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 12:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.