Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De Medeiros

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Michael De Medeiros}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Michael De Medeiros}})

Does not meet neither of Wikipedia's notability or sourcing guidelines OhNoKaren (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Health and fitness, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Delete for lack of any sources about him. I searched on Google news and found zero articles about him; they were all written by him or name-checks. I note that Popsugar is not a reliable source. Likewise, all the hits on Google books are to electronic or coffee table books by him, or by his friends, and nothing about him. I don't think that being editor of a notable magazine automatically makes him notable. Bearian (talk) 11:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.