Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dellums

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BLP, also no evidence of notability. TravellingCari 02:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Michael Dellums]]=

:{{la|Michael Dellums}} ([{{fullurl:Michael Dellums|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dellums}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Notability is not asserted or established in this article, and it certainly isn't inherited. Whether this is good or bad, being a convicted murderer does not convey notability either. Finally, whether or not one is a convicted murderer, the article must still adhere to WP:BLP, and without sufficient sources, it is questionable that this article does so. I do understand most of the claims are made in the one citation given in the article, but I'm not sure it's enough, and there's still the problem of the subject not being notable in the first place. Frank {{!}} talk 12:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete No independent claim to notability outside one event, only notable for how it affected others. gnfnrf (talk) 04:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

:Delete as a Coatrack. The subject of the article is being used to attack his father. Horologium (talk) 01:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.